I STOPPED LOOKING FOR THE SECRET PROMPT
For a while I thought the secret was the prompt.
If I just said the right thing in the right way that I would get what I wanted. My early adoption of using AI tools was often frustrating, but sometimes exciting, until I changed my approach.
I had a decade of unfinished creative work, a professional identity that had drifted, and felt like there were recurring patterns in my life that I had become blinded to seeing. I used a Large Language Model (LLM) to interpret the way that I used language. I uploaded samples of my written work over a period of time; I asked it to question me about my values, virtues and vision. I wanted to see if I could uncover consistent patterns, recurring themes or frameworks across different eras of my life or industries that I have worked in or different creative projects.
What came back was reductionistic but also clarifying. My personal point of view has largely been developed across spiritual beliefs, family culture, visual art, cybersecurity, DIY culture, and systems thinking. This is a very narrow view of what the world. The AI primarily reflected back from this context and so I kept pushing. I asked it to go deeper and look for my patterns of thinking in other cultures and other times. Now I had new areas to explore, new things to learn, new connections to make.
That’s when I understood how I was using these tools. I don’t desire to use them as thinking machines but as reflective surfaces. My definition of creativity is simple : making connections. In my personal creative process, one thing I seek is to connect what I learn to what I know while remaining flexible to understand when what I know needs refinement. While using these tools I felt that I could visualize my creative process.
I asked it how to build an agent that could help me iterate through ideas and it helped me to build a multi-agentic creative council based on my personal philosophical framework. Once this agent was developed I was able to move between multiple models and products and found the value stayed consistent — because the value was never in the tool. I shipped creative work after a ten year drought and then I kept producing. None of that happened because the AI was powerful. It happened because I showed up with enough accumulated depth to use a reflective surface well.
AI doesn’t have to be part of this type of work for you at all.
People have always accessed this kind of clarity through reading deeply, through meditation, through sustained writing practice, through being in nature, through observation, through making things with their hands. The through line in all of those is the same. You are doing the work of developing a mind worth amplifying. The tool just extends your reach.
What I’m watching in the AI adoption conversation concerns me. The focus is almost entirely on the capability of the tools. Very little of it is about the capability of the people using them. We are building governance frameworks, training programs, and organizational strategies around what AI can do. That inversion will cost us something. AI isn’t just a reflective surface it is an amplifier. A powerful amplifier with nothing worth amplifying just makes a lot of noise. I don’t want more noises, I’d rather hear voices. I want to hear what you have to say.
